The Medical Journalism session at ScienceOnline2010 was held entirely in unconference format and I think it went extremely well. A description of the session can also be found here. We focused on several current issues, including:
- recent scientific recommendations regarding breast and prostate cancer screening
- the frequent lack of statistical understanding when it comes to journalists reporting on medical research
- the difficulty in finding quality medical information on the first few pages of Google search results
- pharma and FDA regulations surrounding social media engagement
Quite often in medical reporting, anecdote trumps data; participants in the session agreed that the best way to report on research is to tell a story, backed by facts.
Session statistics and conversation:
Below is a transcript of Twitter conversation in chronological order of posting during the ScienceOnline2010 session “Medical Journalism”.
Number of Tweets: 36 (average of 1.1 tweets/2 minutes during the 65 minute session)
Number of unique Tweeters: 17
mindofandre:
Discussing the connection between media sensationalism, misinformation and clinical evidence in medical journalism #scio10
SciTri:
Karl Bates on prostate screening: “Turns out there are no computers involved in digital screening. #scio10 #SITT
ivanoransky:
“Turns out there’s no digital” in that exam — priceless quote by @klb8s re: prostate cancer in med journalism session #scio10
f1000:
app US-originated PR issue but prostate/tsticlr cancer worldwide prob RT mammogram debate in med journalism session #scio10 /via @Mary_Spiro
patriclane:
RT @SciTri Karl Bates on prostate screening: “Turns out there are no computers involved in THAT kinda digital screening #scio10
nancyshute:
Turns out there’s no computer in that “digital” prostate exam: Best quote of #scio10, from @klb8s at medical journalism session.
nancyshute:
Instead of calculus in high school, we should teach statistics. @klb8s at #scio10 medical journo session.
nancyshute:
Q on how to get quality medical information above page 6 in a Google search, from @wjjessen; SEO for scientists and journalists? #scio10
mindofandre:
Discussing pharma companies and the regulations surrounding social media engagement #scio10
nancyshute:
PR guy says his pharma clients aren’t in social media because they’re scared of the FDA, Google Sidewiki. #scio10
Mary_Spiro:
RT @nancyshute: PR guy says his pharma clients aren’t in social media because they’re scared of the FDA, Google Sidewiki. #scio10
nancyshute:
PR guy: I’m tasked by my pharma clients to get a mommy blogger to say something nice about us. #scio10
ivanoransky:
Heavily regulated ads RT @nancyshute: APCO rep: pharma clients aren’t in social media bc they’re scared of the FDA, Google Sidewiki #scio10
nancyshute:
Does anecdote trump data? Participants in medical journo session say tell me a story, backed by facts. #scio10
 | Walter Jessen is a digital strategist, writer, web developer and data scientist. You can typically find him behind the screen something with an internet connection. |

Pingback: BoraZ (Bora Zivkovic)
Pingback: wjjessen (Walter Jessen)
Pingback: andrewspong (Andrew Spong)